From Christmas Lights to Green Lights: Moving an AI Pilot to Enterprise Adoption

When MIT’s The GenAI Divide report dropped, the headline “95% of generative AI pilots fail” spread faster than holiday gossip. It was a lump of coal for the market, but for those of us deep in the industry, it wasn't a prophecy, it was a warning

I was discussing this report at length over dinner with a customer recently. We looked past the sensational headline to unwrap the real gift inside the data: purchased AI solutions succeed about 67% of the time, compared with only 33% for internal builds.

Why are internal builds underperforming so often? It isn't because the code is bad. It’s because of three "silent killers" that act like the Grinch, stealing the success of your project before it sees the New Year.

1. The Workshop Has a Revolving Door (The Continuity Challenge)

The report blames "demo culture," but the reality is that internal teams are often pulled into operational fires, like tangled Christmas lights, leaving the AI pilot to wither. When the product owner moves on, the project usually stalls. Innovation requires dedicated focus, something internal teams rarely have the luxury to maintain during the busy season (or any season).

2. The "Secret Recipe" Problem (Tribal Knowledge)

We’ve all seen it: a model works during the pilot, but the "how" and "why" live in one person's head, like a secret eggnog recipe that wasn't written down. When that ownership shifts, the institutional knowledge becomes siloed.

The MIT report points out that many generic models lack domain depth. But the deeper issue is that internal builds often fail to capture the institutional memory needed to sustain a product for years. Without built-in knowledge management, you aren't building a product; you're building a dependency on a specific employee

3. Flashy Toys vs. Durable Gifts

The 33% success rate for internal builds suggests a hard truth: innovation is difficult to operationalize part-time. We all know the feeling of a flashy toy that breaks by noon on Christmas Day. "Demo Culture" is exactly that, pilots that look good but don't last

Real AI means real results. But getting there requires moving beyond "experiments" and treating AI as a core business transformation, one that requires continuity, not just code. Partners provide the stability to ensure the solution survives employee turnover.

The Bottom Line

The MIT report is a useful warning, but not a prophecy. The 95% failure rate doesn’t apply to organizations that treat AI as a business transformation rather than a tech trial.

Whether you build or buy, the requirement for success is the same: stability. If your AI strategy relies on a specific internal team remaining intact forever, you aren't building a strategy, you’re making a gamble.

To move from the 33% who fail to the 67% who succeed , we have to stop building for the "demo" and start building for longevity. This stability is not just about internal efficiency; it's about delivering client value.Real AI means real results, but you only get them when you prioritize the business continuity required to make those results stick.

Make that your New Year's Resolution.

Don't bet your future on a demo. Connect with our team today to learn how EvolutionIQ delivers real AI results with built-in stability and client-centric value. Or download our whitepaper on the Build vs. Buy debate to see the full framework for operationalizing AI with stability and impact.

‍

‍